Maximum Number of Groups With Increasing Length
HardPrompt
You are given a 0-indexed array usageLimits of length n.
Your task is to create groups using numbers from 0 to n - 1, ensuring that each number, i, is used no more than usageLimits[i] times in total across all groups. You must also satisfy the following conditions:
- Each group must consist of distinct numbers, meaning that no duplicate numbers are allowed within a single group.
- Each group (except the first one) must have a length strictly greater than the previous group.
Return an integer denoting the maximum number of groups you can create while satisfying these conditions.
Example 1:
usageLimitsExample 2:
usageLimitsExample 3:
usageLimits
Constraints:
1 <= usageLimits.length <= 1051 <= usageLimits[i] <= 109
Approaches
3 approaches with complexity analysis and trade-offs.
This approach explores the problem space by trying to build groups one by one recursively. It tries all possible valid group compositions at each step. A recursive function would try to form the k-th group, given the state of usage of numbers and the size of the (k-1)-th group.
Algorithm
- Define a recursive function
solve(k, prev_size, current_usages)wherekis the group number to form,prev_sizeis the size of groupk-1, andcurrent_usagestracks usage of each number. - The function aims to maximize the number of groups starting from
k. - Initialize
max_groups = 0. - Iterate through all possible sizes
sfor groupk, fromprev_size + 1ton. - For each size
s, generate all combinations ofsdistinct numbers from0ton-1. - For each combination:
- Check if this group is valid by comparing required usages with
usageLimits - current_usages. - If valid, create
next_usagesby updatingcurrent_usages. - Recursively call
res = 1 + solve(k + 1, s, next_usages). - Update
max_groups = max(max_groups, res).
- Check if this group is valid by comparing required usages with
- Return
max_groups. - The initial call would be
solve(1, 0, initial_usages).
Walkthrough
The core idea is to define a recursive function, say findMaxGroups(groupNum, prevGroupSize, usage), which tries to find the maximum number of additional groups that can be formed starting from group groupNum.
groupNum: The index of the current group to form (e.g., 1, 2, 3...).prevGroupSize: The size of the previously formed group. The current group must be larger than this.usage: An array or map to track the current usage of each numberi, ensuring it doesn't exceedusageLimits[i].
The function would work as follows:
- Iterate through all possible sizes
sfor the current group, wheres > prevGroupSize. - For each size
s, iterate through all combinations ofsdistinct numbers. - For each combination, check if using these numbers is valid (i.e., their usage doesn't exceed their limits).
- If a valid group can be formed, make a recursive call:
1 + findMaxGroups(groupNum + 1, s, updatedUsage). - The function returns the maximum value found among all valid choices. The base case is when no valid group can be formed, in which case it returns 0.
This approach is highly inefficient because it explores a vast number of possibilities (combinations of sizes and numbers) and would lead to a Time Limit Exceeded verdict on any reasonably sized input.
Complexity
Time
O(2^N * N!) or worse. The number of subsets of numbers is `2^N`, and for each subset, we can arrange them in groups. The branching factor is huge. This is computationally infeasible.
Space
O(N * k_max) for the recursion stack, where `k_max` is the maximum number of groups.
Trade-offs
Pros
Conceptually simple in terms of exploring all possibilities.
Cons
Extremely inefficient and will time out for all but the smallest inputs.
Complex to implement correctly due to managing combinations and state.
This approach leverages the monotonic nature of the problem. If we can form k groups, we can also form k-1 groups. This allows us to binary search for the maximum possible number of groups, k. For each k we test, we need an efficient way to determine if it's possible to form k groups.
Algorithm
-
Sort the
usageLimitsarray in non-decreasing order. This is done once. -
Initialize binary search variables:
low = 0,high = n,ans = 0. -
While
low <= high:- Calculate
mid = low + (high - low) / 2. - If
can_form(mid, usageLimits)is true:- This means
midgroups are possible. We store it as a potential answer and try for more. ans = mid.low = mid + 1.
- This means
- Else (
can_form(mid, usageLimits)is false):midgroups are not possible. We need to try a smaller number.high = mid - 1.
- Calculate
-
Return
ans. -
can_form(k, sorted_limits) function:
- Initialize
groups_formed = 0,total_elements = 0. - Iterate through each
limitinsorted_limits:total_elements += limit.- Let
next_group_num = groups_formed + 1. - Calculate
required_elements = next_group_num * (next_group_num + 1) / 2. - If
total_elements >= required_elements:groups_formed = next_group_num.
- Return
groups_formed >= k.
- Initialize
Walkthrough
The search space for the answer k is from 0 to n (the number of elements in usageLimits), as we need at least k distinct numbers to form the k-th group.
The main challenge is the can_form(k) function. This function checks if it's possible to form k groups with increasing lengths. To maximize our chances, we should use the minimum possible lengths: 1, 2, ..., k. The total number of elements required is the sum 1 + 2 + ... + k = k * (k + 1) / 2.
A greedy strategy can be used within can_form(k). We sort usageLimits to handle the scarcest numbers first. We iterate through the sorted limits, accumulating the total number of elements available (total_elements). At each step, we check if total_elements is sufficient to form the next group.
The can_form(k) function works as follows:
- It takes a potential number of groups
kand the sortedusageLimitsarray. - It simulates the greedy group formation process. It maintains a count of
groups_formedandtotal_elementscollected so far. - It iterates through the sorted
usageLimits. In each step, it adds the current limit tototal_elements. - It checks if the
total_elementscollected are enough to formgroups_formed + 1groups. The required number of elements formgroups ism * (m + 1) / 2. - If
total_elementsis sufficient forgroups_formed + 1groups, it incrementsgroups_formed. - After iterating through all limits, it returns
trueifgroups_formed >= k, andfalseotherwise.
The main function performs a binary search. It sorts usageLimits once. Then, it repeatedly calls can_form(mid) to narrow down the search range for k.
import java.util.Arrays;import java.util.List; class Solution { public int maxIncreasingGroups(List<Integer> usageLimits) { long[] limits = new long[usageLimits.size()]; for (int i = 0; i < usageLimits.size(); i++) { limits[i] = usageLimits.get(i); } Arrays.sort(limits); int low = 0, high = usageLimits.size(); int ans = 0; while (low <= high) { int mid = low + (high - low) / 2; if (canForm(mid, limits)) { ans = mid; low = mid + 1; } else { high = mid - 1; } } return ans; } private boolean canForm(int k, long[] limits) { if (k == 0) { return true; } long totalElements = 0; int groupsFormed = 0; for (long limit : limits) { totalElements += limit; long nextGroupNum = groupsFormed + 1; // Using long to prevent overflow for k*(k+1)/2 long requiredElements = nextGroupNum * (nextGroupNum + 1) / 2; if (totalElements >= requiredElements) { groupsFormed++; } } return groupsFormed >= k; }}Complexity
Time
O(N log N). Sorting takes `O(N log N)`. The binary search performs `O(log N)` iterations, and each call to `canForm` takes `O(N)`. So, the total time is `O(N log N + N log N) = O(N log N)`.
Space
O(N) or O(log N) depending on the sort implementation. In Java, `Arrays.sort` for primitives uses a dual-pivot quicksort which takes `O(log N)` space on average. If we consider the copy of the list to an array, it's `O(N)`.
Trade-offs
Pros
Much more efficient than brute-force.
Guaranteed to find the optimal solution due to the monotonic property.
Cons
Less efficient than the direct greedy approach because of the
log Nfactor from the binary search, which involves multiple passes over the data.
This is the most efficient approach. The core idea is that to maximize the number of groups, we should be as frugal as possible with the elements. By sorting the usageLimits, we can process numbers with smaller limits first. We greedily form groups whenever we accumulate enough elements to satisfy the requirements for the next group size.
Algorithm
- Sort the
usageLimitsarray in non-decreasing order. - Initialize
groups = 0andtotal_elements = 0L(use long to prevent overflow). - Iterate through each
limitin the sortedusageLimits:- Add the current
limittototal_elements. - Let
k = groups + 1. This is the number of groups we are trying to form now. - The minimum total elements required for
kgroups isk * (k + 1) / 2. - If
total_elements >= (long)k * (k + 1) / 2:- We can form
kgroups. Updategroups = k.
- We can form
- Add the current
- Return
groups.
Walkthrough
The intuition is that if we can form k groups, the total number of elements used must be at least 1 + 2 + ... + k = k * (k + 1) / 2. The greedy choice is to form a new group as soon as this condition is met.
- Sort
usageLimits: We sort theusageLimitsarray in non-decreasing order. This allows us to consider the numbers with the tightest constraints first. By accumulating their counts, we see if they can collectively support forming groups. - Iterate and Accumulate: We iterate through the sorted limits, maintaining a running sum of the limits encountered so far (
total_elements) and the number of groups we have successfully formed (groups). - Greedy Check: In each iteration, after adding the current
limittototal_elements, we check if we can form the next group. If we have formedgroupsgroups so far, the next one would be groupgroups + 1. The total number of elements needed to formgroups + 1groups of minimal sizes1, 2, ..., groups + 1is(groups + 1) * (groups + 2) / 2. - Form Group: If
total_elementsis greater than or equal to this required amount, it means we have enough "material" to form the(groups + 1)-th group. So, we incrementgroups. The logic holds because by processing sorted limits, we ensure that by the time we form groupk, we have already considered at leastkdistinct numbers (sincegroupscan't grow faster than the loop index). This satisfies the distinctness constraint for the largest group.
This single pass after sorting is sufficient to find the maximum number of groups.
import java.util.Collections;import java.util.List; class Solution { public int maxIncreasingGroups(List<Integer> usageLimits) { Collections.sort(usageLimits); long totalElements = 0; int groups = 0; for (int limit : usageLimits) { totalElements += limit; long nextGroupCount = groups + 1; // Check if the accumulated elements are sufficient to form 'nextGroupCount' groups // with sizes 1, 2, ..., nextGroupCount. // The total elements required is the sum of an arithmetic series. if (totalElements >= nextGroupCount * (nextGroupCount + 1) / 2) { groups++; } } return groups; }}Complexity
Time
O(N log N). The dominant operation is sorting the `usageLimits` array. The subsequent loop is a single pass, taking `O(N)` time.
Space
O(log N) or O(N). `Collections.sort` in Java for Lists uses Timsort, which requires `O(N)` space in the worst case. If it were an array of primitives, it would be `O(log N)`.
Trade-offs
Pros
Optimal time complexity for this problem.
Simpler to implement than the binary search approach.
More efficient in practice than binary search as it only requires a single pass over the data after sorting.
Cons
The correctness of the greedy strategy is not immediately obvious without careful reasoning.
Solutions
Solution
class Solution {public int maxIncreasingGroups(List<Integer> usageLimits) { Collections.sort(usageLimits); int k = 0; long s = 0; for (int x : usageLimits) { s += x; if (s > k) { ++k; s -= k; } } return k; }}class Solution {public: int maxIncreasingGroups(vector<int> &usageLimits) { sort(usageLimits.begin(), usageLimits.end()); int k = 0; long long s = 0; for (int x : usageLimits) { s += x; if (s > k) { ++k; s -= k; } } return k; }};class Solution: def maxIncreasingGroups(self, usageLimits: List[int]) -> int: usageLimits . sort() k, n = 0, len(usageLimits) for i in range(n): if usageLimits[i] > k: k += 1 usageLimits[i] -= k if i + 1 < n: usageLimits[i + 1] += usageLimits[i] return kVideo walkthrough
Newsletter
One sharp idea, every week
System design and interview prep — short enough to finish.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Practice
Same difficulty — related problems to reinforce the pattern.