Minimum Operations to Make Array Elements Zero
HardPrompt
You are given a 2D array queries, where queries[i] is of the form [l, r]. Each queries[i] defines an array of integers nums consisting of elements ranging from l to r, both inclusive.
In one operation, you can:
- Select two integers
aandbfrom the array. - Replace them with
floor(a / 4)andfloor(b / 4).
Your task is to determine the minimum number of operations required to reduce all elements of the array to zero for each query. Return the sum of the results for all queries.
Example 1:
Input: queries = [[1,2],[2,4]]
Output: 3
Explanation:
For queries[0]:
- The initial array is
nums = [1, 2]. - In the first operation, select
nums[0]andnums[1]. The array becomes[0, 0]. - The minimum number of operations required is 1.
For queries[1]:
- The initial array is
nums = [2, 3, 4]. - In the first operation, select
nums[0]andnums[2]. The array becomes[0, 3, 1]. - In the second operation, select
nums[1]andnums[2]. The array becomes[0, 0, 0]. - The minimum number of operations required is 2.
The output is 1 + 2 = 3.
Example 2:
Input: queries = [[2,6]]
Output: 4
Explanation:
For queries[0]:
- The initial array is
nums = [2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. - In the first operation, select
nums[0]andnums[3]. The array becomes[0, 3, 4, 1, 6]. - In the second operation, select
nums[2]andnums[4]. The array becomes[0, 3, 1, 1, 1]. - In the third operation, select
nums[1]andnums[2]. The array becomes[0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. - In the fourth operation, select
nums[3]andnums[4]. The array becomes[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. - The minimum number of operations required is 4.
The output is 4.
Constraints:
1 <= queries.length <= 105queries[i].length == 2queries[i] == [l, r]1 <= l < r <= 109
Approaches
2 approaches with complexity analysis and trade-offs.
For each query [l, r], we can simulate the process directly. The core idea is to determine the total number of 'reduction' steps required to make all numbers in the range [l, r] zero. A single reduction step is defined as x -> floor(x / 4). The total number of operations is determined by how many of these reduction steps are needed in total across all numbers in the array. Since each operation allows us to perform two such reductions simultaneously (by picking two numbers a and b), the minimum number of operations will be the total number of reductions divided by two, rounded up.
Algorithm
- For each query
[l, r]:- Initialize
totalReductions = 0. - Loop
xfromltor:- Calculate
ops(x), the number of timesxmust be divided by 4 to become 0. - Add
ops(x)tototalReductions.
- Calculate
- The result for the query is
(totalReductions + 1) / 2.
- Initialize
- Sum the results for all queries.
Walkthrough
The algorithm first calculates ops(x), which is the number of reduction steps needed for a single integer x to become zero. This is done by repeatedly applying integer division by 4 to x and counting the steps until x is 0.
For each query [l, r], the algorithm proceeds as follows:
- Initialize a variable
totalReductionsto zero. - Iterate through each integer
xfromltor. - For each
x, computeops(x)and add it tototalReductions. - After the loop,
totalReductionsholds the sum of all reduction steps for the entire array[l, ..., r]. - The minimum number of operations for the query is
ceil(totalReductions / 2), which can be calculated using integer arithmetic as(totalReductions + 1) / 2. - The results for all queries are summed up to get the final answer.
class Solution { private int ops(int n) { int count = 0; while (n > 0) { n /= 4; count++; } return count; } public long minimumOperations(int[][] queries) { long totalOpsSum = 0; for (int[] query : queries) { int l = query[0]; int r = query[1]; long currentTotalReductions = 0; // This loop is inefficient for large ranges for (int i = l; i <= r; i++) { currentTotalReductions += ops(i); } totalOpsSum += (currentTotalReductions + 1) / 2; } return totalOpsSum; }}Complexity
Time
O(sum(r_i - l_i) * log(r_i)) over all queries. Given that `r` can be up to 10^9, the range `r - l` can be very large, making this approach too slow for the given constraints.
Space
O(1), as we only use a few variables to store intermediate sums.
Trade-offs
Pros
Simple to understand and implement.
Directly follows the problem's logic.
Cons
Extremely inefficient for large ranges
[l, r].Will result in a Time Limit Exceeded (TLE) error on most platforms for the given constraints.
The brute-force approach is inefficient because it repeatedly calculates sums over large ranges. This can be optimized using prefix sums. We define a function P(n) that calculates the total number of reduction steps for all integers from 1 to n, i.e., P(n) = sum_{i=1 to n} ops(i). With this function, the total reductions for a range [l, r] can be found in constant time as P(r) - P(l-1). The main challenge is to compute P(n) efficiently for any given n up to 10^9.
Algorithm
- Define a function
calculatePrefixSum(n)that computessum_{i=1 to n} ops(i)inO(log n)time by grouping numbers based on theiropsvalue. - For each query
[l, r]:- Calculate the total reductions for the range:
totalReductions = calculatePrefixSum(r) - calculatePrefixSum(l - 1). - The result for the query is
(totalReductions + 1) / 2.
- Calculate the total reductions for the range:
- Sum the results for all queries.
Walkthrough
We can compute P(n) efficiently by observing that ops(x) is constant for all x within specific ranges defined by powers of 4.
ops(x) = 1forxin[1, 3](i.e.,[4^0, 4^1 - 1])ops(x) = 2forxin[4, 15](i.e.,[4^1, 4^2 - 1])- In general,
ops(x) = kforxin[4^(k-1), 4^k - 1]
To calculate P(n), we can iterate through these power-of-4 ranges instead of iterating through each number up to n.
Algorithm to calculate P(n) (named calculatePrefixSum):
- Initialize
totalOps = 0,k = 1(ops count), andpowerOf4 = 1. - Loop while
powerOf4 <= n:- The current range where
ops(x) = kis[powerOf4, powerOf4 * 4 - 1]. - Calculate how many numbers from
[1, n]fall into this range:count = min(n, powerOf4 * 4 - 1) - powerOf4 + 1. - Add the contribution of this group:
totalOps += count * k. - Update for the next iteration:
powerOf4 *= 4,k++.
- The current range where
- This loop runs
O(log n)times, making the calculation very fast.
Overall Algorithm:
- Initialize
totalOpsSum = 0. - For each query
[l, r]:- Calculate
totalReductions = calculatePrefixSum(r) - calculatePrefixSum(l - 1). - The operations for this query are
(totalReductions + 1) / 2. - Add this to
totalOpsSum.
- Calculate
- Return
totalOpsSum.
class Solution { // Calculates sum of ops(i) for i from 1 to n private long calculatePrefixSum(long n) { if (n == 0) { return 0; } long totalOps = 0; long powerOf4 = 1; int k = 1; while (powerOf4 <= n) { long startRange = powerOf4; // Use a check to prevent overflow when calculating endRange long endRange = (powerOf4 > Long.MAX_VALUE / 4) ? Long.MAX_VALUE : powerOf4 * 4 - 1; long countInRange = Math.min(n, endRange) - startRange + 1; totalOps += countInRange * k; if (powerOf4 > Long.MAX_VALUE / 4) { break; // Avoid overflow in the next iteration } powerOf4 *= 4; k++; } return totalOps; } public long minimumOperations(int[][] queries) { long totalOpsSum = 0; for (int[] query : queries) { long l = query[0]; long r = query[1]; long sum_r = calculatePrefixSum(r); long sum_l_minus_1 = calculatePrefixSum(l - 1); long totalReductions = sum_r - sum_l_minus_1; totalOpsSum += (totalReductions + 1) / 2; } return totalOpsSum; }}Complexity
Time
O(Q * log(max_r)), where `Q` is the number of queries and `max_r` is the maximum value of `r`. This is very efficient and passes the given constraints.
Space
O(1), as the prefix sums are calculated on-the-fly without any large data structures.
Trade-offs
Pros
Highly efficient and scalable for large input ranges.
Optimal time complexity for this problem structure.
Cons
The logic is more complex, requiring mathematical insight into the problem structure.
Requires careful handling of large numbers (using
long) to avoid overflow.
Video walkthrough
Newsletter
One sharp idea, every week
System design and interview prep — short enough to finish.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Practice
Same difficulty — related problems to reinforce the pattern.