Peeking Iterator
MedPrompt
Design an iterator that supports the peek operation on an existing iterator in addition to the hasNext and the next operations.
Implement the PeekingIterator class:
PeekingIterator(Iterator<int> nums)Initializes the object with the given integer iteratoriterator.int next()Returns the next element in the array and moves the pointer to the next element.boolean hasNext()Returnstrueif there are still elements in the array.int peek()Returns the next element in the array without moving the pointer.
Note: Each language may have a different implementation of the constructor and Iterator, but they all support the int next() and boolean hasNext() functions.
Example 1:
Input
["PeekingIterator", "next", "peek", "next", "next", "hasNext"]
[[[1, 2, 3]], [], [], [], [], []]
Output
[null, 1, 2, 2, 3, false]
Explanation
PeekingIterator peekingIterator = new PeekingIterator([1, 2, 3]); // [1,2,3]
peekingIterator.next(); // return 1, the pointer moves to the next element [1,2,3].
peekingIterator.peek(); // return 2, the pointer does not move [1,2,3].
peekingIterator.next(); // return 2, the pointer moves to the next element [1,2,3]
peekingIterator.next(); // return 3, the pointer moves to the next element [1,2,3]
peekingIterator.hasNext(); // return False
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 10001 <= nums[i] <= 1000- All the calls to
nextandpeekare valid. - At most
1000calls will be made tonext,hasNext, andpeek.
Follow up: How would you extend your design to be generic and work with all types, not just integer?
Approaches
2 approaches with complexity analysis and trade-offs.
This approach uses a Queue data structure to store all elements from the iterator. While this works, it's not memory efficient as it stores all elements upfront.
Algorithm
- Initialize a Queue in constructor
- Copy all elements from iterator to queue
- For peek(): return queue.peek()
- For next(): return queue.poll()
- For hasNext(): return !queue.isEmpty()
Walkthrough
In this approach, we initialize a Queue and store all elements from the iterator into it. This allows us to easily peek at the next element using the queue's peek operation. However, this approach uses extra space proportional to the size of the iterator.
class PeekingIterator implements Iterator<Integer> { private Queue<Integer> queue; public PeekingIterator(Iterator<Integer> iterator) { queue = new LinkedList<>(); while (iterator.hasNext()) { queue.offer(iterator.next()); } } public Integer peek() { return queue.peek(); } @Override public Integer next() { return queue.poll(); } @Override public boolean hasNext() { return !queue.isEmpty(); }}The implementation is straightforward:
- In the constructor, we create a new queue and copy all elements from the iterator into it
- peek() simply returns the first element in the queue without removing it
- next() removes and returns the first element from the queue
- hasNext() checks if the queue is not empty
Complexity
Time
O(n) for initialization, O(1) for peek(), next(), and hasNext() operations
Space
O(n) where n is the number of elements in the iterator
Trade-offs
Pros
Simple implementation
Easy to understand
O(1) time complexity for all operations after initialization
Cons
Uses extra space to store all elements
Not memory efficient
Copies all elements during initialization
This approach maintains a single cached element to support the peek operation. It's more memory efficient as it only stores one element ahead.
Algorithm
- Store iterator and cache first element in constructor
- For peek(): return cached element
- For next(): return cached element and update cache
- For hasNext(): check if cached element exists
Walkthrough
This approach keeps track of the next element by caching it. When peek() is called, we return the cached element. When next() is called, we return the cached element and cache the next element from the iterator.
class PeekingIterator implements Iterator<Integer> { private Iterator<Integer> iterator; private Integer nextElement; public PeekingIterator(Iterator<Integer> iterator) { this.iterator = iterator; // Cache the first element if exists if (iterator.hasNext()) { nextElement = iterator.next(); } } public Integer peek() { return nextElement; } @Override public Integer next() { Integer result = nextElement; nextElement = iterator.hasNext() ? iterator.next() : null; return result; } @Override public boolean hasNext() { return nextElement != null; }}The implementation works as follows:
- In the constructor, we store the iterator and cache the first element if it exists
- peek() returns the cached element without modifying any state
- next() returns the cached element and updates the cache with the next element from the iterator
- hasNext() checks if we have a cached element
Complexity
Time
O(1) for all operations including initialization
Space
O(1) as it only stores one element
Trade-offs
Pros
Memory efficient - only stores one element
O(1) time complexity for all operations
No upfront processing required
Can be easily extended to work with generic types
Cons
Slightly more complex implementation
Needs to handle null cases carefully
Solutions
Solution
// Java Iterator interface reference: // https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/util/Iterator.html class PeekingIterator implements Iterator < Integer > { private Iterator < Integer > iterator ; private boolean hasPeeked ; private Integer peekedElement ; public PeekingIterator ( Iterator < Integer > iterator ) { // initialize any member here. this . iterator = iterator ; } // Returns the next element in the iteration without advancing the iterator. public Integer peek () { if (! hasPeeked ) { peekedElement = iterator . next (); hasPeeked = true ; } return peekedElement ; } // hasNext() and next() should behave the same as in the Iterator interface. // Override them if needed. @Override public Integer next () { if (! hasPeeked ) { return iterator . next (); } Integer result = peekedElement ; hasPeeked = false ; peekedElement = null ; return result ; } @Override public boolean hasNext () { return hasPeeked || iterator . hasNext (); } }/* * Below is the interface for Iterator, which is already defined for you. * **DO NOT** modify the interface for Iterator. * * class Iterator { * struct Data; * Data* data; * public: * Iterator(const vector<int>& nums); * Iterator(const Iterator& iter); * * // Returns the next element in the iteration. * int next(); * * // Returns true if the iteration has more elements. * bool hasNext() const; * }; */ class PeekingIterator : public Iterator { public: PeekingIterator ( const vector < int >& nums ) : Iterator ( nums ) { // Initialize any member here. // **DO NOT** save a copy of nums and manipulate it directly. // You should only use the Iterator interface methods. hasPeeked = false ; } // Returns the next element in the iteration without advancing the iterator. int peek () { if ( ! hasPeeked ) { peekedElement = Iterator :: next (); hasPeeked = true ; } return peekedElement ; } // hasNext() and next() should behave the same as in the Iterator interface. // Override them if needed. int next () { if ( ! hasPeeked ) return Iterator :: next (); hasPeeked = false ; return peekedElement ; } bool hasNext () const { return hasPeeked || Iterator :: hasNext (); } private: bool hasPeeked ; int peekedElement ; };# Below is the interface for Iterator, which is already defined for you. # # class Iterator: # def __init__(self, nums): # """ # Initializes an iterator object to the beginning of a list. # :type nums: List[int] # """ # # def hasNext(self): # """ # Returns true if the iteration has more elements. # :rtype: bool # """ # # def next(self): # """ # Returns the next element in the iteration. # :rtype: int # """ class PeekingIterator : def __init__ ( self , iterator ): """ Initialize your data structure here. :type iterator: Iterator """ self . iterator = iterator self . has_peeked = False self . peeked_element = None def peek ( self ): """ Returns the next element in the iteration without advancing the iterator. :rtype: int """ if not self . has_peeked : self . peeked_element = self . iterator . next () self . has_peeked = True return self . peeked_element def next ( self ): """ :rtype: int """ if not self . has_peeked : return self . iterator . next () result = self . peeked_element self . has_peeked = False self . peeked_element = None return result def hasNext ( self ): """ :rtype: bool """ return self . has_peeked or self . iterator . hasNext () # Your PeekingIterator object will be instantiated and called as such: # iter = PeekingIterator(Iterator(nums)) # while iter.hasNext(): # val = iter.peek() # Get the next element but not advance the iterator. # iter.next() # Should return the same value as [val].Video walkthrough
Newsletter
One sharp idea, every week
System design and interview prep — short enough to finish.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Practice
Same difficulty — related problems to reinforce the pattern.