Merge Operations for Minimum Travel Time
HardPrompt
You are given a straight road of length l km, an integer n, an integer k, and two integer arrays, position and time, each of length n.
The array position lists the positions (in km) of signs in strictly increasing order (with position[0] = 0 and position[n - 1] = l).
Each time[i] represents the time (in minutes) required to travel 1 km between position[i] and position[i + 1].
You must perform exactly k merge operations. In one merge, you can choose any two adjacent signs at indices i and i + 1 (with i > 0 and i + 1 < n) and:
- Update the sign at index
i + 1so that its time becomestime[i] + time[i + 1]. - Remove the sign at index
i.
Return the minimum total travel time (in minutes) to travel from 0 to l after exactly k merges.
Example 1:
Input: l = 10, n = 4, k = 1, position = [0,3,8,10], time = [5,8,3,6]
Output: 62
Explanation:
-
Merge the signs at indices 1 and 2. Remove the sign at index 1, and change the time at index 2 to
8 + 3 = 11. - After the merge:
positionarray:[0, 8, 10]timearray:[5, 11, 6]
-
Segment Distance (km) Time per km (min) Segment Travel Time (min) 0 → 8 8 5 8 × 5 = 40 8 → 10 2 11 2 × 11 = 22 - Total Travel Time:
40 + 22 = 62, which is the minimum possible time after exactly 1 merge.
Example 2:
Input: l = 5, n = 5, k = 1, position = [0,1,2,3,5], time = [8,3,9,3,3]
Output: 34
Explanation:
- Merge the signs at indices 1 and 2. Remove the sign at index 1, and change the time at index 2 to
3 + 9 = 12. - After the merge:
positionarray:[0, 2, 3, 5]timearray:[8, 12, 3, 3]
-
Segment Distance (km) Time per km (min) Segment Travel Time (min) 0 → 2 2 8 2 × 8 = 16 2 → 3 1 12 1 × 12 = 12 3 → 5 2 3 2 × 3 = 6 - Total Travel Time:
16 + 12 + 6 = 34, which is the minimum possible time after exactly 1 merge.
Constraints:
1 <= l <= 1052 <= n <= min(l + 1, 50)0 <= k <= min(n - 2, 10)position.length == nposition[0] = 0andposition[n - 1] = lpositionis sorted in strictly increasing order.time.length == n1 <= time[i] <= 1001 <= sum(time) <= 100
Approaches
2 approaches with complexity analysis and trade-offs.
A brute-force approach involves exploring all possible sequences of exactly k merge operations. We can define a recursive function that tries every possible merge at each step.
Algorithm
["Define a recursive function solve(positions, times, k).","If k is 0, calculate and return the total travel time for the current configuration.","Initialize min_time to infinity.","Iterate through all possible merge operations on the current set of signs.","For each merge, create new positions' and times' arrays.","Call solve(positions', times', k-1) and update min_time with the minimum value found.","Return min_time."]
Walkthrough
The state of our recursion can be defined by the current position and time arrays, and the number of merges k remaining. The function would look like solve(current_positions, current_times, k_left).
- Base Case: If
k_leftis 0, we calculate the total travel time based on the currentpositionsandtimesarrays and return it. - Recursive Step: We iterate through all valid merge operations. A merge can be performed on adjacent signs at indices
iandi+1for0 < i < n-1(wherenis the current number of signs). For each possible merge:- We simulate the merge: create new
positions'andtimes'arrays reflecting the changes. - We make a recursive call:
solve(positions', times', k_left - 1). - We keep track of the minimum travel time returned by all recursive calls.
- We simulate the merge: create new
This approach is exhaustive and guaranteed to find the minimum time, but it's highly inefficient because it recomputes solutions for the same subproblems and explores a very large number of paths.
// This is a conceptual representation. A full implementation would be very verbose.class Solution { public long minimumTime(int l, int n, int k, int[] position, int[] time) { // Convert arrays to lists for easier manipulation List<Integer> posList = new ArrayList<>(); for (int p : position) posList.add(p); List<Integer> timeList = new ArrayList<>(); for (int t : time) timeList.add(t); return solve(posList, timeList, k); } private long solve(List<Integer> pos, List<Integer> time, int k) { if (k == 0) { return calculateTotalTime(pos, time); } long minTime = Long.MAX_VALUE; // Iterate through all possible merges // Merge signs at i and i+1, which removes sign at i // Valid i is from 1 to current_n - 2 for (int i = 1; i < pos.size() - 1; i++) { List<Integer> nextPos = new ArrayList<>(pos); List<Integer> nextTime = new ArrayList<>(time); // Perform the merge int removedTime = nextTime.get(i); nextPos.remove(i); nextTime.remove(i); nextTime.set(i, nextTime.get(i) + removedTime); minTime = Math.min(minTime, solve(nextPos, nextTime, k - 1)); } return minTime; } private long calculateTotalTime(List<Integer> pos, List<Integer> time) { long totalTime = 0; for (int i = 0; i < pos.size() - 1; i++) { long distance = pos.get(i + 1) - pos.get(i); totalTime += distance * time.get(i); } return totalTime; }}Complexity
Time
O((n-2)!/(n-2-k)! * n * k). The number of ways to choose k ordered merges is P(n-2, k). Each recursive call involves creating new arrays, taking O(n) time. The recursion depth is k. This is computationally infeasible for the given constraints.
Space
O(n*k) due to the recursion stack depth (`k`) and storing new copies of arrays (`n`) at each level.
Trade-offs
Pros
Simple to understand conceptually.
Correctly explores all possibilities.
Cons
Extremely inefficient.
Will time out for the given constraints.
A more efficient approach uses dynamic programming. The problem can be modeled as partitioning the original signs into groups. Each group consists of one kept sign followed by zero or more removed signs. The total number of merges determines the number of removed signs. The key challenge is that the travel time of a segment depends on the time property of its starting sign, which in turn depends on the signs removed before it.
Algorithm
["First, understand that the problem is equivalent to partitioning the signs s_0, ..., s_{n-1} into n-k groups, where each group starts with a kept sign and is followed by removed signs.","The travel time of a segment between two kept signs s_p and s_i depends on s_p's time property, which in turn depends on the sign s_m kept before s_p.","Define a 3D DP table dp[i][j][p] to store the minimum travel time ending at pos[i], with s_i kept, j merges used, and s_p as the previously kept sign.","Precompute prefix sums of the time array for efficient calculation of time properties.","Initialize the DP table with a value indicating infinity (e.g., -1 or Long.MAX_VALUE).","Set up base cases for when s_0 is the first kept sign.","Iterate through i (current kept sign), p (previous kept sign), m (pre-previous kept sign), and j (merges) to fill the DP table using the transition formula.","The final answer is the minimum value in dp[n-1][k][p] for all possible p."]
Walkthrough
We can define a DP state that captures all necessary information to build the solution incrementally.
DP State:
dp[i][j][p] = The minimum total travel time for the road up to position[i], given that:
- Sign
s_iis kept. - A total of
jmerges have been performed on signss_1, ..., s_{i-1}. - The sign kept immediately before
s_iwass_p.
DP Transition:
To compute dp[i][j][p], we consider that signs s_{p+1}, ..., s_{i-1} must have been removed. This accounts for i - p - 1 merges. The remaining j - (i - p - 1) merges must have occurred before sign s_p. The state before s_p is characterized by dp[p][j - (i - p - 1)][m], where s_m was the sign kept before s_p.
The travel time for the new segment from s_p to s_i is (position[i] - position[p]) * T_p, where T_p is the time property of sign s_p. This property is the sum of original time values for all signs from s_{m+1} to s_p.
The recurrence is:
dp[i][j][p] = min_{0 <= m < p} { dp[p][j - (i - p - 1)][m] + (position[i] - position[p]) * sum(time[l] for l from m+1 to p) }
We can precompute prefix sums of the time array to calculate the sum in O(1).
Base Cases:
The first segment always starts at s_0. If s_i is the next kept sign after s_0, then p=0. This requires i-1 merges. The travel time is (position[i] - position[0]) * time[0]. So, dp[i][i-1][0] = (position[i] - position[0]) * time[0] for 1 <= i < n as long as i-1 <= k.
Final Answer:
The minimum total time after exactly k merges is the minimum of dp[n-1][k][p] over all possible penultimate kept signs s_p (0 <= p < n-1).
import java.util.Arrays; class Solution { public long minimumTime(int l, int n, int k, int[] position, int[] time) { long[][][] dp = new long[n][k + 1][n]; for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { for (int j = 0; j <= k; j++) { Arrays.fill(dp[i][j], -1); } } long[] timeSum = new long[n + 1]; for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { timeSum[i + 1] = timeSum[i] + time[i]; } // Base cases: s_0 is the first kept sign for (int i = 1; i < n; i++) { int merges = i - 1; if (merges <= k) { dp[i][merges][0] = (long)(position[i] - position[0]) * time[0]; } } // DP transitions for (int i = 2; i < n; i++) { // current kept sign for (int p = 1; p < i; p++) { // previous kept sign for (int m = 0; m < p; m++) { // prev-prev kept sign int mergesBetween = i - p - 1; long segmentTime = (long)(position[i] - position[p]) * (timeSum[p + 1] - timeSum[m + 1]); for (int prevMerges = 0; prevMerges <= k - mergesBetween; prevMerges++) { if (dp[p][prevMerges][m] != -1) { int currentMerges = prevMerges + mergesBetween; long newTotalTime = dp[p][prevMerges][m] + segmentTime; if (dp[i][currentMerges][p] == -1 || newTotalTime < dp[i][currentMerges][p]) { dp[i][currentMerges][p] = newTotalTime; } } } } } } long minTime = Long.MAX_VALUE; for (int p = 0; p < n - 1; p++) { if (dp[n - 1][k][p] != -1) { minTime = Math.min(minTime, dp[n - 1][k][p]); } } return minTime; }}Complexity
Time
O(n^3 * k). The state is defined by `i`, `j`, and `p`. The transition involves iterating over `m`. The loops run up to `n` for `i`, `p`, `m` and up to `k` for `j`. Specifically, the loops can be structured as `i` (1 to n-1), `p` (1 to i-1), `m` (0 to p-1), and `j_prev` (0 to k), leading to O(n^3 * k) complexity.
Space
O(n^2 * k) for the DP table `dp[i][j][p]` where `i` and `p` go up to `n`, and `j` goes up to `k`.
Trade-offs
Pros
Correctly models the complex dependencies between merge operations.
Efficient enough to pass within the given constraints.
Guaranteed to find the optimal solution.
Cons
The DP state and transitions are complex to formulate and implement correctly.
High memory usage due to the 3D DP table.
Video walkthrough
Newsletter
One sharp idea, every week
System design and interview prep — short enough to finish.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Practice
Same difficulty — related problems to reinforce the pattern.