Merge Operations for Minimum Travel Time
HardPrompt
You are given a straight road of length l km, an integer n, an integer k, and two integer arrays, position and time, each of length n.
The array position lists the positions (in km) of signs in strictly increasing order (with position[0] = 0 and position[n - 1] = l).
Each time[i] represents the time (in minutes) required to travel 1 km between position[i] and position[i + 1].
You must perform exactly k merge operations. In one merge, you can choose any two adjacent signs at indices i and i + 1 (with i > 0 and i + 1 < n) and:
- Update the sign at index
i + 1so that its time becomestime[i] + time[i + 1]. - Remove the sign at index
i.
Return the minimum total travel time (in minutes) to travel from 0 to l after exactly k merges.
Example 1:
Input: l = 10, n = 4, k = 1, position = [0,3,8,10], time = [5,8,3,6]
Output: 62
Explanation:
-
Merge the signs at indices 1 and 2. Remove the sign at index 1, and change the time at index 2 to
8 + 3 = 11. - After the merge:
positionarray:[0, 8, 10]timearray:[5, 11, 6]
-
Segment Distance (km) Time per km (min) Segment Travel Time (min) 0 → 8 8 5 8 × 5 = 40 8 → 10 2 11 2 × 11 = 22 - Total Travel Time:
40 + 22 = 62, which is the minimum possible time after exactly 1 merge.
Example 2:
Input: l = 5, n = 5, k = 1, position = [0,1,2,3,5], time = [8,3,9,3,3]
Output: 34
Explanation:
- Merge the signs at indices 1 and 2. Remove the sign at index 1, and change the time at index 2 to
3 + 9 = 12. - After the merge:
positionarray:[0, 2, 3, 5]timearray:[8, 12, 3, 3]
-
Segment Distance (km) Time per km (min) Segment Travel Time (min) 0 → 2 2 8 2 × 8 = 16 2 → 3 1 12 1 × 12 = 12 3 → 5 2 3 2 × 3 = 6 - Total Travel Time:
16 + 12 + 6 = 34, which is the minimum possible time after exactly 1 merge.
Constraints:
1 <= l <= 1052 <= n <= min(l + 1, 50)0 <= k <= min(n - 2, 10)position.length == nposition[0] = 0andposition[n - 1] = lpositionis sorted in strictly increasing order.time.length == n1 <= time[i] <= 1001 <= sum(time) <= 100
Approaches
2 approaches with complexity analysis and trade-offs.
A brute-force approach involves exploring all possible sequences of exactly k merge operations. We can define a recursive function that tries every possible merge at each step.
Algorithm
["Define a recursive function solve(positions, times, k).","If k is 0, calculate and return the total travel time for the current configuration.","Initialize min_time to infinity.","Iterate through all possible merge operations on the current set of signs.","For each merge, create new positions' and times' arrays.","Call solve(positions', times', k-1) and update min_time with the minimum value found.","Return min_time."]
Walkthrough
The state of our recursion can be defined by the current position and time arrays, and the number of merges k remaining. The function would look like solve(current_positions, current_times, k_left).
- Base Case: If
k_leftis 0, we calculate the total travel time based on the currentpositionsandtimesarrays and return it. - Recursive Step: We iterate through all valid merge operations. A merge can be performed on adjacent signs at indices
iandi+1for0 < i < n-1(wherenis the current number of signs). For each possible merge:- We simulate the merge: create new
positions'andtimes'arrays reflecting the changes. - We make a recursive call:
solve(positions', times', k_left - 1). - We keep track of the minimum travel time returned by all recursive calls.
- We simulate the merge: create new
This approach is exhaustive and guaranteed to find the minimum time, but it's highly inefficient because it recomputes solutions for the same subproblems and explores a very large number of paths.
// This is a conceptual representation. A full implementation would be very verbose.class Solution { public long minimumTime(int l, int n, int k, int[] position, int[] time) { // Convert arrays to lists for easier manipulation List<Integer> posList = new ArrayList<>(); for (int p : position) posList.add(p); List<Integer> timeList = new ArrayList<>(); for (int t : time) timeList.add(t); return solve(posList, timeList, k); } private long solve(List<Integer> pos, List<Integer> time, int k) { if (k == 0) { return calculateTotalTime(pos, time); } long minTime = Long.MAX_VALUE; // Iterate through all possible merges // Merge signs at i and i+1, which removes sign at i // Valid i is from 1 to current_n - 2 for (int i = 1; i < pos.size() - 1; i++) { List<Integer> nextPos = new ArrayList<>(pos); List<Integer> nextTime = new ArrayList<>(time); // Perform the merge int removedTime = nextTime.get(i); nextPos.remove(i); nextTime.remove(i); nextTime.set(i, nextTime.get(i) + removedTime); minTime = Math.min(minTime, solve(nextPos, nextTime, k - 1)); } return minTime; } private long calculateTotalTime(List<Integer> pos, List<Integer> time) { long totalTime = 0; for (int i = 0; i < pos.size() - 1; i++) { long distance = pos.get(i + 1) - pos.get(i); totalTime += distance * time.get(i); } return totalTime; }}Complexity
Time
O((n-2)!/(n-2-k)! * n * k). The number of ways to choose k ordered merges is P(n-2, k). Each recursive call involves creating new arrays, taking O(n) time. The recursion depth is k. This is computationally infeasible for the given constraints.
Space
O(n*k) due to the recursion stack depth (`k`) and storing new copies of arrays (`n`) at each level.
Trade-offs
Pros
Simple to understand conceptually.
Correctly explores all possibilities.
Cons
Extremely inefficient.
Will time out for the given constraints.
Video walkthrough
Newsletter
One sharp idea, every week
System design and interview prep — short enough to finish.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Practice
Same difficulty — related problems to reinforce the pattern.